The Front Page/HOME Gun Pics/GGPs Lists The Weekend Women

Thursday, May 15, 2008


Bottom of Comments | Comment Form

You Want Reasons?

Kim du Toit
May 15, 2008
11:00 AM CDT

Apparently, the Stupid Party has woken up and smelled the coffee—or, to be more precise, woken up to the smell of the house burning down while they were sleeping:

For the past 18 months, ever since the 2006 elections, congressional Republicans have been like a hospital patient trying to convince visitors that he is not really all that sick: a bit under the weather; actually feel better than I sound; should be up and about any day; thanks for asking.

Suddenly — belatedly — all pretense is gone.

The Republican defeat in Tuesday’s special election in Mississippi, in a deeply conservative district where, in an average year, Democrats cannot even compete, was a clear sign that the GOP has the political equivalent of cancer that has spread throughout the body. Many House GOP operatives are privately predicting that the party could easily lose up to 20 seats this fall.

Combined with the 30 seats that the GOP lost in 2006, that would leave the party facing a 70-vote deficit against Democrats in the House — a state of powerlessness reminiscent of Republicans’ long wilderness years in the 1960s and ’70s.

Things are not particularly more hopeful on the Senate side, where most analysts say Democrats have a strong chance of adding five or more seats to their current majority.

Panic and blame-casting for the dire condition were flowing in equal measures Wednesday inside the House Republican Conference and among party elders and operatives outside.

Yeah, panic, you little shits. You support RINOs like Arlen Specter and John McCain, and you wonder why you lose conservative seats like the one in Mississippi?

Your party’s standard-bearer going into November is the senator who has stabbed the party faithful in the back more times than we care to remember, and you wonder why he has no coat-tails for the Congressional elections?

You introduce legislation which is a “compromise” between a Republican and a liberal Democrat like Ted Kennedy, and you wonder why we don’t support you?

You talk about “immigration reform”—which we all know is really a disguise for an amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants—and when over 70% of the country’s voters tells you that such legislation is repulsive, you wait awhile, and reintroduce almost the same legislation?

You made no serious attempt to reform the iniquitous tax code, and replace it with a fair and simpler one.

You allowed your original mandate of smaller, frugal government to be corrupted into a free-spending, licentious and lawless atmosphere, where anything was acceptable as long as it wasn’t as bad as what the Democrats were promising.

The current President (a man who promised to be conservative, and then turned out to be anything but) did not groom a successor while in office, and replace the current Vice-President with a younger version of Dick Cheney (an outstanding man and conservative), thus leaving the Election 2008 field open to a bunch of RINOs like McCain and Romney.

Did you think we were asleep while you were doing all this stuff?

Conservatives are not the Republican Party’s “base”, no matter what the smart boys and consultants tell you. We are not the same as the Democrat Party’s Black voters or union leaders, who will vote for the party without regard to what they do, or how many times they compromise their principles.

We are conservatives. We don’t like change, especially the kinds of change which can undermine the principles and Constitution of this country. We don’t like “compromise” when the people on the other side of the negotiation get almost everything they want, and we get almost nothing.

We do not march in the streets with placards and puppets. We do not write hysterical screeds to the newspapers. We do not say ugly things about our country to foreigners and strangers.

We vote. We vote either with our ballots, or, if the choices are that unpalatable, we vote with our feet and stay away.

You think we have nowhere else to go? I have news for you. We have plenty of places to go, on Election Day. We can go to the library, we can go to the bar, and we can go to the shooting range, to name just a few.

You have precisely three months to come up with a plan, a roadmap to the future, which will not compromise our country’s future, and which will not undermine the Constitution any more than you have done already.

Conservatives are not your base; they are your foundation. And unless you start reaffirming your commitment to those principles which have made this country great, you will find out, like you just have in Mississippi, that you have no foundation left.

Here’s your blueprint. Get back to these bedrock principles, and you’ll win everything.

  • The Constitution, strictly interpreted
  • Smaller government
  • Lower taxes
  • Armed citizens
  • Frugal spending
  • Robust foreign policy
  • Law and order
  • Conservative judges.
Now you know.




Comments

Bottom of Comments | Comment Form | Original Post

  1. *Some* of them get “it”, and when they speak, the idiots in charge refuse to listen to them.

    We can only hope they’ll listen now.  IDIOTS!

    308Mike | 5/15/2008 11:23 AM CDT | #119816
  2. Sorry for the duplicate.  Can’t delete with this interface.

    Tyler

    Tyler | 5/15/2008 11:24 AM CDT | #119817
  3. Kim,

    Perfect rant & perfect prescription for the stupid party.  The fly in the ointment is the fact that they are stupid—so it will all fall on deaf ears.

    Tyler

    Tyler | 5/15/2008 11:24 AM CDT | #119818
  4. I keep getting requests for money from the National Republican Congressional Committee, and I keep sending them back with the note that I contribute to the NRA Politgical Victory Fund.  I also give money directly to a local Idaho Representative, Bill Sali.  He is a real conservative - makes the local Boise newspaper froth at the mouth.  Votes against most spending bills, supports the military, good friend of gun owners.  I will NOT give money to the national Repubs, because so they will give it to McCain-type RINOs.

    bigranvil | 5/15/2008 11:29 AM CDT | #119820
  5. This sums up my thoughts quite nicely, my friend.

    I don’t even identify myself as a Republican, but a conservative.

    They are no longer even similar.

    The Republican Party deserves every bit of the failure it is reaping.

    molonlabe28 | 5/15/2008 11:32 AM CDT | #119821
  6. May I plagiarize large portions of this to mail to my representatives?

    Weetabix | 5/15/2008 11:39 AM CDT | #119823
  7. Plagiarize away.

    Kim du Toit | 5/15/2008 11:40 AM CDT | #119824
  8. Plagiarize away.

    Kim du Toit | 5/15/2008 11:40 AM CDT | #119825
  9. We do not write hysterical screeds to the newspapers.

    I dunno, I’ve been known to blog a screed or two:)

    Tom The Impaler | 5/15/2008 11:48 AM CDT | #119827
  10. Thanks, Kim,
    I just e-mailed it to every e-mail address on the contact page at GOP.com.

    FlintlockTom | 5/15/2008 11:49 AM CDT | #119828
  11. I get so depressed, and emailing these brick walls does no good. When I get as down as I now am on the future (or lack thereof) of this country, re-reading Silent America is really the only thing that helps and gives me hope… but now I’m not sure that will even do the trick.

    I’m terrified for the world and country my children will inherit.

    hindmost | 5/15/2008 12:07 PM CDT | #119832
  12. I have no hope for the NOvember elections. I’ll likely be back in the desert on deployment so I’m going to do my absentee ballot the best I can without flinching, gnashing, or wauling, and just focus on maybe excercising my powers as a citizen by helping kill my country’s enemies.

    grayburst | 5/15/2008 12:14 PM CDT | #119833
  13. Whoa!
    I got an, almost, immediate reply from the RNC:

    “Thank you for contacting the Republican National Committee. We certainly appreciated your email, and will include your thoughts in our report to the Chairman. Please do not hesitate to contact us in the future with any of your thoughts, opinions or observations.

    Office of Constituent Services
    Republican National Committee

    Apparently, if I read between the lines, they are going to immediately incorporate all your points into their platform.

    I’m encouraged.

    FlintlockTom | 5/15/2008 12:16 PM CDT | #119834
  14. The only thing I would add to the list is maintaining a strong and effective military.

    Achilles | 5/15/2008 12:18 PM CDT | #119835
  15. Hold not thy breath; evidence suggests they don’t get it. Here’s Tom Davis, “Republican” of Virginia:

    He believes Bush’s staunch opposition to the Democratic housing bill and the SCHIP bill, for example, is hurting rank and file.

    Ranks right up there with George Voinovich wagging his bony finger and telling (his own constituents, mind you) “You. Do. Not. Intimidate. George. Voinovich,” during the scamnesty debacle of ‘07...right before he changed his vote.

    Perhaps they’re trying out a new campaign slogan, in keeping with McCain’s Navy background:

    “We have not yet begun to suck.”

    MiddleAgedKen | 5/15/2008 12:20 PM CDT | #119836
  16. I agree with every single point Kim, and there are many of us like you and I out here… And why the RNC seems incapable of grasping that as a gestalt I cannot imagine.  I can’t vote for McCain, given his stand on the border and illegals---which I am sure he has not changed, privately---and on the 2nd Amendment, on which he is not strong enough.  I will vote, but probably write in Teddy Roosevelt again.  The fact that he’s been dead since 1919 is a minor quibble given our current choices for president.

    Mustang | 5/15/2008 12:29 PM CDT | #119837
  17. And yet, THINK about this; if we FAIL to vote FOR a candidate that can actually GET ELECTED instead of that WITCH Lady Hildemort, or ObamaRamaDingDong (whichever wins in August), then we will find ourselves with a SOCIALIST (at best) at 1600 PA.
    Other than CDR. DumbJohn’s Navy service, I don’t think a lot of him either, but I’d rather have HIM than either of THEM. Yeah, I know; it’s a far cry from the way I USUALLY rave about him, but think about it; how much raving do I do FOR McCain, and how much do I do for McCain INSTEAD OF ANY DemCong LibTard? Look at the difference - not between the two candidates, but between the two ravings.
    Remember, I was originally for FDT. Who wimped out - probably didn’t REALLY want it in the first place; after all, the Oval Office is AT LEAST 5 times as much work as the sound stage!
    Please, guys; AT LEAST TRY to elect someone who can actually be elected; don’t do a ‘Mickey Mouse’ write-in protest vote. That wastes your franchise.

    The Mad Yank | 5/15/2008 12:45 PM CDT | #119839
  18. Here, here!
    I completely agree.

    The Republicans need to wake the hell up, ASAP.

    If not, I’ll park my butt somewhere in the desert on election day with my weapons and ammo and have at it there.

    I can’t hold my nose and vote for this guy. The Republicans need to get the message.

    1IDVET | 5/15/2008 12:49 PM CDT | #119840
  19. Kim,

    you forgot “actually resist the collectivist policies of the socialists, you know fight with them and try to win!”

    Mors | 5/15/2008 12:51 PM CDT | #119843
  20. The last time there was an unfettered Democratic majority in the House and Senate, and a Dem president, was in the mid-60’s. That group arguably did more to damage the U.S. than any set of politicians before or since. The Great Society implemented the ruinous redistributionist welfare and entitlement programs that have proven to be impervious to meaningful reform ever since. As to foreign policy, we had Johnson and his staff unsuccessfully micromanaging the Vietnam War while Communism advanced throughout the world.
    I shudder at what Obama/Clinton would do with a clear Dem majority.

    tsj55 | 5/15/2008 01:35 PM CDT | #119852
  21. Well said Sir.  To those who say I should hold my nose and vote against the greater evil… no.  Feel free to do so if you like, that’s your privilege.  Mine is to write in whomever I wish and is no more wasted than someone voting for a major candidate.  Anyone who says that clearly doesn’t understand that it’s not about winning, it’s about being a good citizen.  Just because Kerry and Gore lost doesn’t make votes for them wasted (although it may be a strong indicator of mental illness)… they just lost.  That’s the system.  If you’re only going to vote for a winner, don’t bother voting because somebody will win whether you vote or not.  Vote your conscience and it doesn’t matter if your choice wins, your voice was heard.

    Stashiu3 | 5/15/2008 02:15 PM CDT | #119859
  22. *cough*

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_With_America

    *cough*

    Oh.. wait… you really didn’t mean that?

    jellisii | 5/15/2008 03:04 PM CDT | #119864
  23. Just NO leadership.  GWB has no communications skills and that is bad news with a hostile MSM.  GOP congressional leaders believe the Wash Post and think they have to go RINO to stay in office (good way to enable a structural minority status).
    Newt is on the right track (mostly) but no one listening.  The Dems will nominate their weakest candidate since McGovern and RINO McCain will still manage to lose somehow.

    F-4 Dude | 5/15/2008 03:23 PM CDT | #119867
  24. Will anyone be convinced by an election eve conversion? Honestly, the Repubs had 6 years with a Republican president and did nothing positive during that time.

    It would be difficult if not impossible for me to believe a “We’re sorry we acted like pseudo-socialist and we promise to do better next time.”

    I won’t vote for McCain or any other (R). If there is a viable candidate available I’ll vote for him/her. Otherwise I’ll just not vote.

    Even if McCain were to win the donks will almost certainly have a near veto-proof majority. I can only hope the country is strong enough to survive the insanity that will happen these next few years.

    kaba | 5/15/2008 03:31 PM CDT | #119869
  25. I’ve made my decision: it is better to vote Libertarian now and suffer a few years, even decades, of Democrats in charge rather than vote RINO and suffer decade upon decade of RINOs in charge…

    bailey | 5/15/2008 04:09 PM CDT | #119876
  26. Urhm, yup.  You realize if an actual conservative ran he would win both us AND many democrats?  What are they afraid of (conservative politicians and party leadership), they seems afraid to win.  Is there a literal threat to their lives we do not know about?  They will (probably) learn or be thrown out, but while that happens, we burn.  I assume it to be a political hijacking of the Republican Party by liberals.  It is evil.  And, I think, it is too late, perhaps for all of history.  Perhaps.

    Doom | 5/15/2008 05:05 PM CDT | #119885
  27. Oh my gawd...I’m all atwitter...somebody has finally laid out a party platform that I can get behind.  I know that all of those things are what we have been advocating....but it’s about time somebody had the cajones to put them in print.
    We need to print these party planks and hang them on our bathroom mirrors, ice boxes, doors.  We need to be able to subconsciously recite them without hesitation.
    You may think I’m saying all this in jest...but I’m not.  The conservative party/people/base have forgotten these simple trueisms.  We need to once again have them in our psyche.  And the only way is to visualize them day after day.
    May seem naive and simple; but we have to start somewhere!
    Steve

    eacres | 5/15/2008 05:08 PM CDT | #119886
  28. The reason the Republican party didn’t care before now is because of what I call “the battered wife” syndrome.  We are much better than the man down the street (other party), you will vote for us no matter abuse (candidate) we put you through, and most importantly, you won’t ever leave us.  To put it another way, the Republican party was taking Conservatives for granted, using the Boogie man of the other party getting in power, as the way to keep us voting for RINOs.  It didn’t work in 2006, as Conservatives sat out the election, and it won’t work in 2008.

    For those above who think the Republican party wants to loose, I agree.  The country-club Republicans liked being in the minority, look at the Jim Wright years.  A few bones thrown to the voters, and you don’t have to do any hard work, leading the country.

    I fear for the outcome of our country, especially if the Democrats own the House, Senate, & Presidency.  For example: http://www.reason.com/news/show/126018.html (hat-tip: instapundit).  Unfortunately, the choice seems to be between Socialist-lite, Socialist, & outright Communist, and I don’t see the legislation in the above referenced article being opposed by any of the candidates.

    stevesky | 5/15/2008 06:36 PM CDT | #119892
  29. Get back to these bedrock principles, and you’ll win everything.

    But who will implement them?  The problem is not lack of principles, but of people.  Whether it’s apparatchiks, staffers,Congressmen, or State legislators or governors, to be a Republican is to be either a moron or a moral ruin.  The exceptions of course exist but the likelihood of their identity penetrating the media blackout is nil. 
    Feels like March of ‘42.
    .

    stencil | 5/15/2008 06:43 PM CDT | #119893
  30. If you don’t mind, I’m about to snag a piece or few of this post. Like Weetabix and Flintlock Tom, I was extremely well impressed. My attitude right now would lead to huge amounts of profanity. I will do my utmost to remain civil in an introduction, then pass along your post near verbatim.

    cmblake6 | 5/15/2008 07:14 PM CDT | #119897
  31. Feels like 1939 to me. Storms gathering in the east. Waffling politicians in the west. Socialists whining for “peace at any price”, conservative voices of warning cast as warmongers.

    Raven | 5/15/2008 07:30 PM CDT | #119899
  32. Brilliant rant. 10 out of 10!

    I give the GOP two two-year election cycles to come home, or go the way of the Whigs.

    Or, alternatively, we can simply stop spot-welding the Titanic.

    Let the damn thing sink, and build a new party starting with conservatives, and see what you get.

    I can guaran-damn-tee it won’t include McCrazy, et al.
    Boo frickin’ hoo.

    And BTW, I told you 4-6 months ago:
    “President Obama.”

    Get used to saying it.

    Aesop Mysleeve | 5/15/2008 08:27 PM CDT | #119909
  33. Feels like 1939 to me.

    Or 1860.

    MiddleAgedKen | 5/15/2008 08:32 PM CDT | #119910
  34. Even if McCain were to win the donks will almost certainly have a near veto-proof majority.

    I fear for the outcome of our country, especially if the Democrats own the House, Senate, & Presidency.

    Does anybody really think that they will need a veto-proof majority? Consider this for a moment - when the republicrats owned both houses of congress who was the usual defector to the other side? Since 2000 (when the Rs controlled congress) did anybody ever notice Hillary beating a path to take sides with the republicans? Anyone remember her making an effort to “reach across the aisle”? Yeah, I don’t remember any of that either. And how about Obama? Oh, that’s right, he was only in the senate for a couple years as the minority. He has NO REAL EXPERIENCE AT ALL. Now, on the other hand, how many times did Juan McAmnesty throw the members of his own party in the aisle so he could climb over them to beat a path to the other side? Forget about just reaching across...he was stage diving to the other side. The republicans could count themselves lucky if McStain would reach across to them!!! McCain would be a boon to the democrats if he makes it to the big chair...virtually all upside and very little (if any) down. Any failure they can blame on him (and by extension the republicans) and any success would be because they (as the majority) forced in on him. Basically it is win-win for them (and lose-lose for the country). Does anybody really think they will need a veto proof majority and if so what do you base that belief on?

    I still maintain that a demoncrat will be elected to the white house in November (regardless of what letter is next to his/her name on the ballot).

    And sadly, I believe it is too late for the republicrats to get a clue for this up-coming election. Just like Kim mentioned, they still can’t get a grip on the fact that we DO NOT WANT amnesty for illegals. And yet, they keep trying. They refuse to hold the demoncrat’s feet to the fire on a host of issues that they promised to change once they were elected to power. All that stuff about changing the culture in Washington, running the most honest and upfront congress ever...give me a break. As with virtually all politicians, they lied to get elected and it has been business as usual. However, the republicrats have been fairly quiet about it...perhaps because they are so ashamed of how they themselves acted when they held the reins. And the news ain’t never gonna cast the shadow of scrutiny on this group. They will ride the “republicans are evil” horse to the end of the world...the demoncrats can and will basically get away with murder with nary a peep from our “friends” in the MSM. The republicrats have been the minority party for almost 2 years now and the MSM STILL blames them for everything...the dems get a pass everytime. And Mr. & Mrs. America don’t even notice...they still believe the ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC party line that all the nations woes are the results of George Bush and the republicans and that the only cure is for the demoncrats to save us from ourselves. Folks keep your eyes open because times are about to get REAL interesting.

    The Quiet Man | 5/15/2008 08:45 PM CDT | #119911
  35. Almost complete agreement with the excellent rant.

    One quibble: though Romney was liberal-leaning in Massachusetts, he was singing a different, conservative song during the primaries, and I believe that (to switch metaphors) he would have danced with the girl he brought to the dance. In any case, he was the one actually conservative candidate who had a halfway decent chance, winning more Republican voters than McCain in the states that have those insane open primaries. And what was the response? “He’s too nice,” “He’s too clean-cut,” “He’s too successful,” “He’s so untarnished he seems plastic.” The man has a winning smile, a proven track record, a happy family life, he looks presidential, he’s a veritable Ward Cleaver--and that’s what was “wrong” with him? Unbelievable.

    The Stupid Party shot itself in the foot by not selecting him.

    (Full disclosure: I dream of President Tancredo.)

    HarryK | 5/15/2008 09:14 PM CDT | #119918
  36. Like I could add anything.  Great stuff.  I’m learning more and more and would have to agree with whomever(?) stated above that they are conservative but not republican.

    Brutus | 5/15/2008 09:43 PM CDT | #119921
  37. You know, I can’t for the life of me figure why supposed Republicans, and even more supposed conservatives, repeat the Big Lies the media keep repeating over and over. The Republicans nearly had the budget balanced in 2006. The deficit has tripled since the reds took over, the economy slowed to a crawl, taxes are rising again, and the question of funding any remaining fighting is once more open.

    It is childish to imagine that government can shrink during a time of war. It has never happened before in history, and in the past the average person might have had a clue as to the difference twixt right and wrong. Today he is constantly propagandized with lies by the media and by his schooling before that. It’s a wonder there’s even the pale version of free speech we have left, let alone any other rights. In 2006 the average Republican voter heard the lie from the media that Congress was wasting huge amounts of money. So he stayed home. The enemy of life and liberty took control, and expanded wasteful spending severalfold. Do we hear any complaints from the whores in the media this time around? Of course not. Is the deficit a big issue this year? Hell no! Suddenly it’s a twit who couldn’t think himself out of a room full of wet paper bags who’s got all the attention, and he’s calling for the same laughable thing the two incher running in 1992 emptily called for, “CHUUUHHHAAAAAIIIIIIINGE!” The fact that everything turned to shit once we got that same thing in Congress, of course, is a secret the public musn’t be allowed to consider.

    I’m not thrilled with most of the Republicans in Congress, but I’m also not a ninny. I know they can’t dream up an entire agenda against the multi-trillion dollar leftist machine and stay on course without help and backing. They haven’t gotten it, so they’re going to compromise. They did that. Yet to this day we’re treated to idiocies like first the Republicans being called bad because they didn’t invite homosexualists into their midst, and then their being bad because a couple got into politics, while the “liberal” and “open” press made sure every slander ever uttered about them was put before the public, though they knew them to be lies. Now we’ve got thugs and mafiosi in charge of Congress, but we can’t hear about that because they’re in the wrong party.

    You may forget that a huge portion of the 1994 conservatives retired in 2000 as they promised to do. Many were also defeated in 1998 by the media and the Chinese agent in the White House. That was tough for Republicans, and they sure as hell haven’t come back much since then. The morons who supported term limits can take a great deal of the blame for the weakening of conservatives since 1998.

    If you want better, you have to make it better yourselves. Otherwise, quit bellyaching.

    I would point out that Bush took a great risk in 2005 in trying to reform Social Security. The cowards abandoned him even when the public supported the reforms by 5:1. After more than half a year of corporate sponsored attacks in the media, it finally started getting close. Meanwhile, no one did shit to support him or the plan. Americans would have hundreds of billions of dollars EACH MONTH in extra investment in the economy if that had gone through. That was a real conspiracy between the press and the traitor party, and they all deserve death for what they got away with. And so does the cowardly bitch Sen. Chuck Grassley for instantly telling everyone he wouldn’t support it because he’d rather spend his time waiting in line for Schumer like Dick Durbin does.

    TraitorHater | 5/15/2008 11:49 PM CDT | #119930
  38. No one in Congress was kept out by term limits.

    There aren’t any.

    The conservative movement was sabotaged by the McCrazys of the Congress, who couldn’t wait to backstab their ill-disguised contempt for the conservative foundation of the party they supposedly belong to, but run away from the day after the election.

    Most Republicans rightfully castigate Shrillary for clinging to Fat Bill despite his serial infidelities, in her rampant quest for political power.

    That behavior is different from Republicans who vote for the likes of McStain & Co. how, exactly?

    Pot, meet kettle.

    Aesop Mysleeve | 5/16/2008 03:51 AM CDT | #119936
  39. Please please please send this to every single one of the jerkwads in congress...please!

    Or give me permission to send it to mine?

    Oh wait you did sort of tell us we could use it.

    Im not voting FOR Macain, I have to vote against Obama or Hillary.

    immagikman | 5/16/2008 04:33 AM CDT | #119937
  40. Kim, how are they going to come up with a plan, a roadmap to the future, with John McCain at the helm?

    First, I don’t believe or trust a word that comes out of his mouth.  Second, he apparently does represent the GOP as it is today.

    I’m no longer interested in words, or plans, or blueprints.  Give me some actions and then I’ll decide if I wish to support the stupid party.

    It’s too late for this batch of thieves, liars, and liberals in liberals’ clothing.

    Bill Quick | 5/16/2008 09:47 AM CDT | #119972
  41. It almost seems that anyone with values and self respect is sitting out this time around.
    Regan was right about the Soviets. “ let thier own imorality destroy them”.

    Texgun | 5/16/2008 10:03 AM CDT | #119974
  42. It almost seems that anyone with values and self respect is sitting out this time around.
    Regan was right about the Soviets. “ let thier own imorality destroy them”.

    Texgun | 5/16/2008 10:03 AM CDT | #119976
  43. By sitting out and doing nothing because you are disgusted by both parties, you have become
    the instrument of evil, this from the wisdom of:  “all that it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing”.  Even if you cannot vote for Mcairhead, you should at least be voting against Hilarry or Obama.  To do nothing or to waste your vote on a third party serves only to further the goals of evil.

    immagikman | 5/16/2008 08:23 PM CDT | #120035

Add a comment

Bottom of Comments | Original Post

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Bottom of Comments | Comment Form | Original Post


Total Entries: 6278
Total Comments: 66008
Most Recent Entry: 07/06/2008 07:06 am
Most Recent Comment on: 07/06/2008 02:05 pm
Total Members: 2429
Total Logged in members: 9
Total guests: 266
Total anonymous users: 0
Most Recent Visitor on: 07/06/2008 02:45 pm
The most visitors ever was 889 on 01/10/2007 04:01 pm

Current Logged-in Members:  Jeff Wood  LibraryGryffon  Navy guns  P229-357Sig  Patriot in Durban S.A  Rich  rs76239  Rusty Raymond  Tasmanian Devil




StatCounter



Copyright 2002 - 2008 - theothersideofkim.com / Kim du Toit. All rights reserved.

E-mails and comments become the property of Kim du Toit
This site is private property. Limited access is granted by the site owner.
Intentionally circumventing software restrictions is trespassing.



Syndication:
RSS 2.0     Atom Feed